The Moon

One Year of the Moon in 2.5 Minutes

A video of the surface features of the moon taken by the lunar reconissance orbiter

Tour of the Moon

Ocean & Tides

Phases of the Moon

There is a documentary “If We Had No Moon” that aired on the Discovery Channel that explain the potential impact of not having the moon. You might be able to find it on DVD or one of the streaming services.

Updated Theory: A Huge Chunk Of Earth, Blasted Away In A Collision, Is Now The Moon

By Rebecca BoylePosted 10.17.2012 at 3:02 pm

New simulations of a crash between Earth and a protoplanetary sister long ago could have produced a moon that’s chemically similar to our planet, according to a new analysis. It bolsters a theory that the moon is part of Earth, and it helps settle a question about how this could be physically possible.

Since around the time of the Apollo missions, lunar scientists have theorized that our moon formed after a horrendous collision between Earth and another world, which sheared off part of this planet. But all the while, there’s been a major disconnect with reality and the satisfying theoretical explanation of this concept. If that’s what happened, then the moon should be primarily composed of material from the collider, which would have been reincarnated as our natural satellite. Theoretical models and computer simulations of this catastrophic impact say the moon would be about 20 to 40 percent Earth parts and 60 to 80 percent non-Earth parts.

But the moon and the Earth have identical isotopes of key elements, proving the moon was made from Earth’s mantle. A host of theories have tried to explain this, even one suggesting that Earth generated its own internal thermonuclear reaction and blew itself apart.

Some scientists have suggested that Earth and moon material mixed together, so the Earth also contains some foreign matter. But very recent studies cast doubt on this, too. There was another problem in that Earth-sized planets should have been spinning faster than this one did, if that model is correct. Matija Ćuk and colleagues at the SETI Institute started over, and envisioned a very fast-spinning Earth colliding with a smaller-than-Mars planet, nicknamed Theia.

In their computer simulations, which you can see in part below, it all works out. The moon can form from mostly Earth material, and a faster-spinning proto-Earth can lose some angular momentum thanks to tidal interactions with the sun, explaining its slower-than-expected speed.

In this animation, Earth and Theia are represented by the agglomerations of particles. Earth is spinning super-fast–its day is only 2.3 hours long. Theia, which has about half the mass of Mars, careens toward Earth at 44,740 MPH. It penetrates all the way to Earth’s core and excavates a massive hole in our planet, throwing material out in the process. Theia is mostly vaporized, along with part of our planet, and the iron from its core merges with Earth’s core.

Some material escapes Earth and forms a huge disk around it. The disk has almost no iron, but is made mostly of Earthly material. This would explain the moon’s composition, which very neatly matches that of Earth.

To test this hypothesis, a separate group of researchers ran further simulations with slower-moving impactors that were a little larger. This also produces a moon with the same chemical makeup as Earth’s mantle, they found. Taken together, the results suggest that our moon-formation theories may be spot on.

http://bcove.me/6r8mgmwi

Thanks to Logan Ellis for sending this my way…

What Age Is The Moon? It Could Be Waning…

the full moon rises behind the ancient temple of Posseidon (AP Photo/Petros Giannakouris)


WASHINGTON (AP) — That old moon might not be as antique as we thought, some scientist think. They say it’s possible that it isn’t a day over 4.4 billion years old.

But other astronomers disagree with a new study’s conclusions. They think the moon is up to its typical age-defying tricks and is really pushing 4.6 billion as they have suspected all these years.

Either way, the new analysis of an important moon rock brought back by the Apollo 16 mission is showing that the moon isn’t ready to give up its true age and origins quite yet, even though scientists thought they had it all figured out a decade or two ago.

“It’s not as ancient as we might think,” said study chief author Lars Borg, a geochemist at the Lawrence Livermore National Lab. His study appears online Wednesday in the journal Nature.

The study uses new techniques and radioactive isotopes of lead and other elements to date the moon rock at 4.4 billion years old. What’s key is that this is a special type of rock that would have floated up to the moon’s crust soon after its theorized ocean of molten rock cooled. That supposedly happened soon after the moon formed as a result of a spectacular crash between Earth and a planet. The chunks that broke off formed the moon.

That means there are two possibilities, Borg said. Either the moon is 200 million years younger or the accepted theory of a molten rock ocean on the moon is wrong, he said.

Borg acknowledges that some moon rocks have been dated at nearly 4.6 billion years old. But those conclusions could be wrong because of weaker rock dating techniques used in the past, he said.

Outside scientists said Borg did good work coming up with a date for the Apollo 16 rock but may have jumped to the wrong conclusion on lunar age or origins. They said it’s possible that the rock is from a smaller molten rock ocean or was created when the moon was bombarded by space debris which was much more common a few billion years ago.

Borg’s conclusion “is a little bit fancy for my taste,” said Erik Asphaug of University of California, Santa Cruz, who recently published a theory that Earth used to have a second smaller moon until it crashed into the bigger one.

MIT astronomer Maria Zuber called the study in Nature “very puzzling.”

Google-backed Moon robot teams confirmed

18 February 2011 Last updated at 08:51 ET

The Lunar X-Prizes support Nasa's efforts to reduce the costs of space exploration

The final line-up of teams competing for the $30 million (£18.5m) robotic Moon-explorer prize has been confirmed.
The prize will go to the builders of the first robot to send back video as it travels over 500 metres of the Moon’s surface.

Competition organisers hope to spur the development of low-cost robotic space exploration.

The Google-sponsored Lunar X-Prize will be fought over by 29 teams from 17 different countries.

Organisers believe that the competition – first announced in 2007 – could have a winner by 2015.

“The official private race to the Moon is on,” said Peter Diamandis, chief executive of the X-Prize Foundation.

The teams come from a wildly divergent background, ranging from non-profit consortia and university groups to well-funded businesses.

Robotic explorers
Several of the teams have already bought rides on spacecraft to transport their robots.

Astrobotic Technology, a spin off-off from Carnegie Mellon University has signed a deal with SpaceX – the private space company set up by PayPal founder Elon Musk – to use its Falcon 9 rocket.

Meanwhile, government-backed space agencies are also planning to send craft to the Moon.

Spacecraft from a joint Russian and Indian team and a separate one from China are pencilled to set off for the Moon in 2013.

But the X-Prize’s backers think the future of space exploration will be driven by privately-funded groups.

“The most successful and revolutionary discoveries often come from small, entrepreneurial teams,” said Tiffany Montague, of Google Space Initiatives.

Moon Crater Has More Water Than Parts of Earth

Pretty cool… Thought you might find this interesting…

Mr. K

Moon Crater Has More Water Than Parts of Earth
By Mike Wall
SPACE.com Senior Writer
posted: 21 October 2010
02:02 pm ET

A frigid crater at the moon’s south pole is jam-packed with water ice, with some spots wetter than Earth’s Sahara desert, boosting hopes for future lunar bases.

That’s the picture painted by six new studies that analyzed the intentional moon crash of a NASA spacecraft on Oct. 9, 2009. The agency’s LCROSS probe was looking for signs of water when it smashed into Cabeus crater at the moon’s south pole last year, and the spacecraft found plenty of it, as scientists announced last year.

The new results expand on those original findings, revealing that Cabeus harbors many other compounds, too — stuff like carbon monoxide, ammonia, methane, mercury and silver.

And the new studies — reported as six separate papers in the Oct. 22 issue of the journal Science — put a solid number on the amount of frozen water at the moon’s south pole. [10 Coolest New Moon Discoveries]

Water ice makes up about 5.6 percent of the total mass on the floor of Cabeus — making the crater about twice as wet as Sahara Desert soil, according to LCROSS mission principal investigator Tony Colaprete.

“That is a surprise,” said Colaprete, who works at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif. “And it has a lot of ramifications in terms of our understanding of water and other volatiles on the moon.”

Moon water surprises

The high concentration of water ice came as a bit of a shock to mission scientists.

“I still can’t really wrap my brain around it,” said Colaprete, who led one of the studies reported in the journal Science and is a co-author on several others. “There are places on the moon that are wetter than parts of Earth — that’s kind of neat.”

This moon water ice is also relatively pure, the researchers found.

The LCROSS spacecraft picked up ice signatures for four full minutes. If the ice crystals had been impregnated with lots of lunar dirt grains, that signal would have faded within 20 seconds or so, according to Colaprete, since grains heat up fast in sunlight.

“For ice crystals to last more than a minute, they need to be 80 or 90 percent water ice,” Colaprete told SPACE.com. “Otherwise they will sublime, evaporate in the sunlight.”

Another intriguing result was the variety and amount of other substances inside Cabeus.

LCROSS and a sister probe, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), found evidence of all kinds of compounds, including elemental hydrogen, carbon monoxide, ammonia, methane, mercury, calcium, magnesium and silver. And these materials made up a surprisingly large chunk of the crater floor.

“Where we impacted, up to 20 percent was something other than dirt,” Colaprete said. “It was ices, volatiles, light metals. That was a surprise, that you had so much of this material in there.”

Smashing a probe into the moon

The LCROSS spacecraft, short for Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, was built to live fast and die young. It launched, along with LRO, in June 2009 aboard a Centaur rocket.

On Oct. 9 of that year, the Centaur hurtled solo toward Cabeus, a 60-mile-wide (97-km-wide) crater near the moon’s south pole. When the rocket hit, it raised a huge debris plume up into the sunlight, where the two probes could scan it with their instruments, which included cameras and various spectrometers.

LCROSS plummeted just four minutes behind the Centaur, getting an up-close look at the ejecta cloud before smashing into the lunar surface itself. The LRO spacecraft watched all this action from above, peering at the two impacts’ debris plumes. It remains in lunar orbit today, mapping the moon’s surface.

Last November, scientists announced that those plumes contained “significant amounts” of water.

Now, after analyzing more of the data gathered by both LCROSS and LRO, they have a much better idea of just what’s in Cabeus crater — and they’re gaining a better understanding of how it may have gotten there.

Where did all of this stuff come from?

The researchers are still trying to work out exactly how all of these compounds — the water and everything else — made their way to the bottom of Cabeus crater.

The original source of much of the material is likely asteroid or comet impacts, scientists said. Once they arrived, the compounds could have moved all over the lunar surface — liberated from the dirt by micrometeorite strikes or solar heating — until they hit a cold trap like Cabeus.

The permanently shadowed inside of Cabeus is among the coldest places in the solar system, with average temperatures around minus 387 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 233 Celsius). Many compounds would sink into these frigid depths and never surface again. So water, ammonia and everything else could keep accumulating in the crater for billions of years.

“This place looks like it’s a treasure chest of elements, of compounds that have been released all over the moon,” said Peter Schultz of Brown University, lead author of one of the Science papers and co-author of another one. “And they’ve been put in this bucket in the permanent shadows.”

But Colaprete thinks there’s more to the story at Cabeus.

The new research details, in part, how the crater was chosen for the LCROSS kamikaze mission: LRO instruments picked up a strong hydrogen signal in the crater, indicating the likely presence of lots of water ice.

But there are many freezing-cold craters at the moon’s south pole, and most of them didn’t show such a strong hydrogen signature. And some of the places with lots of hydrogen aren’t even in permanent shadow.

Cabeus stands out, indicating that there’s likely more to accumulating large quantities of water — and other materials — than just frigid temperatures.

“I think the best model right now, given the compounds we see, is that the Cabeus site is actually a comet impact site,” Colaprete said.

That’s not to suggest that volatiles don’t migrate around the moon and get trapped in the bottom of permanently shadowed craters. That’s likely happening, too, Colaprete said. But that background process likely can’t fully explain Cabeus.

“It seems to suggest that our old thinking about this kind of uniform emplacement of water over a billion years is only a part — and maybe a minor part — of the story when it comes to these pockets of high concentrations,” Colaprete said.

Going to the moon?

The high concentration of water ice at the bottom of Cabeus is good news for anyone pushing for bases at the moon’s poles.

Future moon-dwellers could conceivably mine such large quantities of ice efficiently. They could it process it into its constituent hydrogen and oxygen, prime ingredients of rocket fuel. And they could melt the ice down and drink it — provided they remove some of the nasty stuff, like mercury.

Some of the other compounds found in the crater — such as elemental hydrogen, methane and ammonia— could be useful, too, according to Colaprete.

“These places are definitely resource-rich and suggest that they would be advantageous to use for producing resources, if it ever came to that,” Colaprete said.

There’s no reason to think Cabeus is an anomaly, Colaprete said. There could be other super-enriched sites like it at both the north and south poles.

And the poles more generally could harbor a lot of water ice, according to the new research. Modeling results support the possibility that there may be large regions of lunar “permafrost,” where relatively accessible ice could be trapped below the surface, even in warmer spots that see the sun occasionally.

And that’s a good thing, because Cabeus itself may not be the ideal site for a lunar base.

For one thing, the floor of the crater is in permanent shadow and incredibly cold. It’s tough to design equipment that can operate at temperatures of minus 387 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 233 Celsius)–and that equipment likely can’t be solar-powered.

Also, the findings suggest that all those volatile compounds form a soft, frosty layer on the Cabeus floor that could bog down rovers or landers. When the Centaur hit, LCROSS measured a 0.3 second delay until a big heat flash resulted.

That’s a very long lag, especially considering that the rocket was moving at 5,580 mph (9,000 kph). The result suggests that the soil is very porous, perhaps almost fluffy.

“If we had hit rock, that flash would have happened almost instantaneously,” Colaprete said.

Sacrificing itself for science

The $79 million LCROSS mission wasn’t the first to find water on the moon — three other spacecraft had previously detected evidence of water ice on the lunar surface, a finding announced just a few weeks before LCROSS’ kamikaze plunge.

But the LCROSS mission is yielding new insights that should change how researchers think about the moon, according to Colaprete. That means the spacecraft’s sacrifice was worth it.

“We went out with a bang,” Colaprete said, “and the return has just been phenomenal.”